Social Media Addiction Lawsuit: The Legal Team from the Landmark Trial

Open, accepting new clients

Meet the Lawyers Behind the Landmark Social Media Addiction Trial

The Lanier Law Firm put the full might of our legal team and dedicated staff behind the landmark trial that secured a historic $6 million verdict in Kaley’s case against Meta and Google’s YouTube. We continue to fight for victims of social media addiction, and our experienced legal team is ready to help you pursue justice and compensation if your child has been affected. Meet the attorneys whose expertise can help you secure the justice your family deserves.

Mark Lanier: One of America's Top Civil Trial Lawyers

Headshot of the Lanier Law Firm's Founder, W. Mark Lanier

Mark Lanier, founder of The Lanier Law Firm, led the trial team that secured the $3 million in compensatory damages jury verdict followed by $3 million in punitive damages against Meta and YouTube for the addictive features on their platforms that harmed K.G.M. Mark has been at the forefront of social media addiction litigation and his leadership in the case has helped hold major tech companies accountable for designing platforms that exploit vulnerable children and teens.

Recognized as one of the nation’s top attorneys, Mark’s accolades include Lawdragon’s 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers and Best Lawyers’ Lawyer of the Year for Mass Tort and Personal Injury Litigation. Featured in publications like The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times, Mark’s tireless work continues to protect children from the harms of social media addiction.

“For years, social media companies have profited from targeting children while concealing the addictive and dangerous design features built into their platforms. Today, we finally have accountability. These companies made deliberate choices that prioritized engagement and profit over the well-being of the young people using their products. This verdict sends a clear message to an entire industry that the era of operating without consequence is over.

Mark Lanier

Rachel Lanier: Committed to Protecting Teens from Social Media Harm

Rachel Lanier's headshot

Rachel Lanier is the Managing Attorney of the Los Angeles Office and a key member of The Lanier Law Firm Trial Team, with a dedicated focus on social media addiction litigation. Rachel has been at the forefront of the fight to hold social media companies accountable for their harmful addictive features, particularly those that impact vulnerable children and teens.

As co-lead counsel in the landmark social media addiction case, Rachel played a crucial role in exposing how these companies knowingly prioritized profit over the well-being of young users.

Recognized as one of Lawdragon’s 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers and named to Best Lawyers for Mass Tort and Personal Injury Litigation, Rachel is also honored as a Top 40 under 40 Civil Plaintiff Lawyer by National Trial Lawyers.

“This verdict is for every child who has suffered because these multibillion-dollar companies decided that engagement metrics mattered more than the well-being of children. These companies had internal research, and instead of warning parents they made a choice to keep profiting from features they knew were hurting kids.” – Rachel Lanier

Why You’ll Want The Lanier Law Firm to Handle Your Social Media Addiction Case

  1. The Lanier Law Firm was the first to take on social media addiction in court: We litigated the first-ever case against Meta and YouTube regarding their addictive features and their impact on youth. No other firm has had the same level of experience or success in handling such landmark cases.
  2. We provide compassionate legal support for families: We understand the emotional toll of social media addiction and are here to guide you through each step with care.
  3. We offer you the highest standard of legal care: Exceptional legal knowledge, transparent communication with regular updates, and compassionate support throughout the entire process.
  4. We have the resources to take on major tech companies: Our experienced team has the capability to challenge billion-dollar corporations and win.
  5. We’re committed to protecting vulnerable children and teens: We fight to ensure social media platforms change their practices to protect kids, while securing fair compensation for families.

Call 800-723-3216 now to explore your legal options after social media addiction harms your teen. Consultations are free.

What Is Social Media Addiction?

Social media addiction is the compulsive urge to access and engage with social media platforms at the expense of attending to other areas of your life. While adults are not immune to the urges of social media use, kids and teens are more susceptible because their neurological development is still progressing, particularly executive functioning and decision-making abilities. As a result, your child may find it more difficult to walk away from social media, even if they realize it isn’t good for them.

Infographic explaining social media addiction and the signs and symptoms

What Are the Signs That Your Child Is Addicted to Social Media?

Teenagers who are addicted to social media often report:

  • Depression
  • Anxiety
  • Body dysmorphia
  • Eating disorders
  • Loneliness
  • The fear of missing out (FOMO)
  • Isolation
  • Low self-esteem
  • Jealousy
  • Worthlessness
  • Difficulty with personal relationships
  • Suicidal thoughts

If you’ve experienced these symptoms or recognize them in your teenager, speak with a licensed mental health professional about your social media use.
You may also want to speak with an experienced social media addiction lawyer, as you may have the right to take legal action if you’ve suffered any ill effects.

How Do Algorithms Encourage Social Media Addiction?

Social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok are billion-dollar companies that profit through advertising. The longer users spend on these platforms, the more money these companies make.

  • The Incentive: These companies have a strong incentive to make users crave social media and keep coming back.
  • The Definition of Social Media Algorithms: Algorithms are sets of instructions that determine which content to show users based on their interests and behaviors. Ideally, they should filter out irrelevant content and provide a personalized experience.
  • The Reality: In practice, the more we see content we like or that triggers an emotional response, the more time we spend scrolling. The more “likes” and notifications we get, the more addictive social media becomes, as they release dopamine, the brain’s feel-good chemical.
  • How Social Media Companies Use Algorithms: These platforms use advanced algorithms to make their products even more addictive, ensuring users stay engaged longer.
  • The Impact on Mental Health: The longer users, especially teens and young adults, spend on social media, the higher the risk of mental health issues like depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation.
  • Key Social Media Addiction Statistics:
    • Teens who spend three or more hours online daily are at increased risk for mental health problems.
    • The average teen spends 3 hours and 1 minute on social media daily, with some spending up to 7 hours.
Infographic about social media algorithms that feed addiction and the words "code," "feed," and "notifications."

Who Can Sue for Addiction to Social Media Platforms?

Social media lawsuits have taken the nation by storm, with more than 1,200 families (and counting) taking legal action.

Americans may have the right to file a lawsuit for social media addiction if:

  • You or your children started using one or more social media apps, including Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, Snapchat, or YouTube, between 5 and 17 years of age
  • You or your children have since used these apps 3 or more hours daily
  • You or your children have suffered one or more of the following injuries:
    • Body dysmorphia
    • Eating disorders
    • Depression
    • Severe anxiety
    • Physical self-harm
    • Suicidal ideation
    • Suicide
  • You or your children have sought or received treatment for said psychological or physical harm

What Compensation Can I Recover in a Social Media Addiction Lawsuit?

The potential consequences of social media addiction can impact every aspect of a victim’s life. For teens, the effects can last a lifetime.

Body dysmorphia and eating disorders can cause severe damage to the body. Depression and anxiety can fundamentally change the course of a young person’s life, driving them away from friends and family and onto dangerous paths.

  • Through a social media addiction suit, you can demand compensation for the financial, physical, and emotional consequences you’ve endured.
  • Potential damages can include money for:
  • Current and future medical bills
  • Cognitive behavioral therapy
  • Dialectical behavior therapy
  • In-patient therapy services
  • Lost job opportunities
  • Reduced earning capacity
  • Emotional distress
  • Embarrassment
  • Damage to reputation
  • Wrongful death of a family member

Infographic with the type of compensation that be obtained in social media lawsuits

You can also send a clear message to social media companies by seeking punitive damages, which can be awarded when there’s clear and convincing evidence that they intentionally caused harm or knowingly failed to disclose the risks associated with their apps and platforms.

Your lawsuit is an opportunity to hold these money- and power-hungry corporations accountable for their actions, while protecting future users from the same fate.

Social Media Companies Know Their Platforms are Addictive And They Don’t Care

Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat, among others, are built to be addictive.

According to Facebook’s former director of monetization, Tim Kendall, Facebook knowingly made its social media platform “as addictive as cigarettes.”

In an interview, Kendall acknowledged that Facebook’s objective is to “get more people to pay attention to your product and to pay attention longer each and every day.” The company created algorithms to make this happen, essentially luring vulnerable and impressionable teenagers onto the platform.

Kendall called Facebook “fundamentally addictive” and admitted that “it’s causing all kinds of mental health issues … [and] eroding aspects of society.”

Kendall’s sentiments were confirmed by Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen, who testified before the U.S. Committee on Science, Commerce, and Transportation on October 4, 2021.

In her testimony, she explained that Facebook executives “repeatedly encountered conflicts between its own profits and our safety” and “consistently resolved those conflicts in favor of its own profits.”

Simply put, social media companies knowingly prioritize profits over the health and well-being of their users. If your child has been hurt by social media, contact our firm today.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

2026 Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Updates

April 6, 2026

The fight continues, and Meta and Google have said they will appeal. We expect the road ahead to be long, but the landmark social media addiction verdict on March 25th remains a meaningful step forward for this litigation.

March 25, 2026

The first social media addiction case in the nation was tried by The Lanier Law Firm as lead trial counsel. Mark Lanier, Rachel Lanier, and Sarah Lanier led the charge at trial, backed by the full strength of our team of attorneys and staff who poured themselves into this case. The trial resulted in a jury verdict ordering Meta Platforms Inc. and Google’s YouTube to pay $3 million in compensatory damages and $3 million more in punitive damages for deliberately designing addictive features on their platforms that contributed to severe mental health harm in a young woman during her preteen and teenage years.

The jury found that Meta was 70% responsible and YouTube 30% responsible for the harm, resulting in $4.2 million awarded against Meta and $1.8 million against Google. The plaintiff, Kaley, bravely took her case to trial and won, holding two of the most powerful companies in the world accountable for the harm their platforms caused her.

The total $6 million landmark verdict is the first jury verdict of its kind anywhere in the country, and it is a significant development for this litigation and everyone involved in it.

January 23, 2026

The Lanier Law Firm is set to be the first firm in the nation to try a social media addiction case on behalf of a bellwether plaintiff when trial begins January 27, 2026 in Los Angeles Superior Court.

This landmark case will examine whether major social media platforms deliberately designed addictive features that have contributed to a youth mental health crisis. Mark Lanier and Rachel Lanier, co-lead counsel in the JCCP coordinated proceeding, will serve as lead trial counsel for the plaintiffs, supported by Lanier Law Firm attorneys Michael Akselrud, Michelle Greene, Abigail Harris, and Sarah Lanier.

The outcomes of these bellwether trials could set important precedents for how social media platforms design their products and interact with young users and may lead to significant settlements or industry-wide changes to protect youth mental health.

Tuesday, Snapchat settled the claims in this first trial.

Thousands of plaintiffs, including individuals and school districts, have brought claims against Meta (Facebook and Instagram), Google (YouTube), ByteDance (TikTok), and Snap Inc. (Snapchat), alleging that these platforms were intentionally designed with features such as “infinite scroll” and autoplay to maximize user engagement at the expense of young users’ mental health. The lawsuits contend that these design choices have contributed to widespread anxiety, depression, and body dysmorphia among youth users. The court has ordered testimony from high-level executives, including Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Instagram head Adam Mosseri, Snap CEO Evan Spiegel, and YouTube CEO Neal Mohan.

The Road to Justice: 2023, 2024, and 2025 in Social Media Litigation

  • September 2025: Rachel Lanier leads the California JCCP social media addiction litigation, overseeing expert depositions as the trial approaches.
  • May 2025: The court selected nine bellwether cases to proceed to trial, with discovery continuing, including depositions from Snap’s CEO Evan Spiegel.
  • January 2025: Judge Kuhl issued this order denying the Defendants’ demurrer and motion to strike claims involving failure to warn, clearing the way for Plaintiffs to pursue such claims in the ongoing social media addiction litigation. A California appellate court summarily denied Defendants’ petition for a writ of mandate challenging an order from Judge Kuhl denying Defendants’ motion to strike claims because of purported §230 protections.
  • December 2024: An appellate court denied the platforms’ petition in appeal.
  • October 2024: A federal judge has allowed a major lawsuit by school districts against social media companies to proceed, marking a significant development in the ongoing battle over youth safety online. The case consolidates hundreds of claims from plaintiffs, including injured individuals, school districts, and state attorneys general, against platforms like Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, and Snapchat. Judge Gonzalez Rogers’ 45-page ruling rejected the platforms’ attempts to dismiss the case. Notably, the order clarified that Section 230 and First Amendment protections don’t shield platforms from claims related to inadequate age verification systems, insufficient parental controls, and lack of default limits on usage time and frequency.
  • September 2024: The parties are continuing to engage in discovery, and depositions of corporate witnesses are scheduled over the coming months. The parties have agreed to a four-month trial extension. The school districts have filed notices of appeal.
  • June 2024: The California JCCP ruled that four school districts cannot pursue claims against Meta, Snap, Google, YouTube, and TikTok for disrupting education. In a different case against Meta, the Ninth Circuit reiterated that that Section 230 is “not limitless,” with one judge calling on the Ninth Circuit to reexamine precedent that broadly interprets Section 230. Individual cases remain active.
  • April 2024: In the federal MDL, both sides have selected bellwether trial cases. In mid-June, the California court will randomly select 24 bellwether cases, with trials set to begin in June 2025. Meanwhile, both parties continue to identify witnesses and negotiate document production.
  • March 2024: The Lanier Law Firm has filed additional cases against social media companies, and several courts have now ruled that lawsuits can proceed. The companies have been ordered to engage in discovery and to produce documents that concern their harmful conduct.
  • January 2024: In a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, lawmakers questioned social media CEOs about the risks their platforms pose to children, focusing on child exploitation and the mental health impacts of social media. CEOs from Meta, TikTok, Snapchat, X, and Discord acknowledged shortcomings. Meanwhile, nearly 500 actions are filed against social media companies, with the Lanier Law Firm leading the push for greater transparency and document production to expose negligent conduct.
  • November 2023: A Senate Judiciary Subcommittee heard testimony from a whistleblower who revealed that Meta knew about the harm young users faced on Facebook and Instagram but ignored safety recommendations. Senators also called for the passage of the Kids Safety Online Act, aimed at protecting children and teens on social media.
  • October 2023: The California JCCP ruled that negligence claims against social media companies can move forward, allowing lawsuits for harm to minors despite Section 230 protections. 408 cases are currently pending in the MDL. Additionally, a bipartisan group of 42 attorneys general filed a federal lawsuit against Meta, accusing Facebook and Instagram of targeting children and teens with addictive features and violating COPPA.
  • July 2023: Key deadlines are met in the Social Media Addiction Multi-District Litigation (MDL), and arguments over Section 230 protections continue.
  • March 2023: The Arkansas Attorney General and Governor announced that The Lanier Law Firm would join them in pursuing litigation against Meta for neurological disorders caused by excessive social media use among children and teens.
Headshot of Rachel Lanier, Managing Attorney, Los Angeles, Product Liability and Pharmaceutical Liability
Rachel Lanier
Managing Attorney, Los Angeles

Rachel Lanier is dedicated to pharmaceutical and product liability, helping secure the $4.6 billion verdict in Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson. Recognized by Best Lawyers (2024-2025) for Mass Tort and Personal Injury, Rachel leads the firm’s social media addiction lawsuits and represents clients in high-profile MDLs.

Contact Our Firm

Schedule a FREE Consultation or Call
800-723-3216

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
First Name(Required)
Last Name(Required)

Call The Lanier Law Firm to Discuss Your Social Media Addiction Claim

Legal FAQs About Addiction to Social Media Platforms

How Long Do I Have to File A Claim for Social Media Addiction?

The time you have to file a claim for social media addiction depends on the statute of limitations in your state. It’s important to consult with an attorney as soon as possible to ensure your case is filed within the required time limits.

What Is the Average Payout for Social Media Platform Addiction Lawsuits?

The payout in social media addiction lawsuits can vary significantly depending on the severity of the harm, the company involved, and the details of the case. In some landmark cases, like the one handled by the Lanier Law Firm, the compensation has reached into the millions. While individual payouts can differ, cases involving serious mental health impacts or addiction-related harms to minors may result in substantial settlements or jury awards.

How Much Does a Social Media Addiction Lawyer Cost?

Most social media addiction lawyers, including those at The Lanier Law Firm, work on a contingency fee basis. This means you don’t pay upfront fees; the lawyer only gets paid if you win or settle your case.

Can Social Media Platforms Be Immune to Liability?

For decades, technology companies relied on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to shield themselves from virtually all litigation related to their platforms. But recently, our plaintiff attorneys have successfully advanced a theory that treated social media platforms as defective products under California product liability law, focusing not on the content users posted, but on the design features the companies engineered to maximize engagement. As a result, The Lanier Law Firm was the first law firm to try a social media addiction case in the nation and win.

Which Social Media Platforms Are Being Sued?

Major platforms named in social media lawsuits in the United States include:

  • Meta: Facing lawsuits against Facebook and Instagram for addictive and harmful features.
  • YouTube: Recently found liable of harm and addiction along with Meta.
  • TikTok: Facing lawsuits for its addictive nature and promotion of dangerous challenges and content.
  • Snapchat: Accused of harm to children, including enabling the purchase of drugs laced with fentanyl through their Snap Maps feature.
  • Discord: Closely related to Roblox lawsuits for sexual exploitation and abuse of children.

Other Ongoing Litigations at The Lanier Law Firm

Open, accepting new clients
Open, accepting new clients
Open, accepting new clients
Open, accepting new clients
Headshot of Lawrence P. Wilson, Lanier Law Firm Senior Attorney in personal injury and product liability.
Lawrence P. Wilson

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Lawrence P. Wilson is dedicated to personal injury, product liability, medical malpractice, and certain maritime matters. He recently settled a $17.5 million personal injury case and secured a favorable verdict in Schwab v. Ford Motor Company. Recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer (2012-2021) and named to Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Lawyers.

Headshot of Alex Abston, Senior Attorney in Pharmaceutical Liability and Product Liability.
Alex Abston

Read Bio

Attorney
Alex Abston is dedicated to pharmaceutical liability, product liability, and mass torts. She was part of the trial team that obtained one of the first federal jury verdicts in MDL 2804, In re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation. Honors include Lawdragon 500 Next Generation (2024) and Texas’ Top 40 Under 40 (2021-2024), among others.

Headshot of Alex Brown, Managing Attorney for the Lanier Law Firm Business Litigation practice.
Alex Brown

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, Business Litigation
Alex Brown is dedicated to business litigation, handling complex disputes in federal, state, and international forums. He led trial teams to secure a $9 billion jury award in the Actos case. Recent honors include Best Lawyers (2024-2025) and Lawdragon 500 (2025), among others.

Headshot of attorney Benjamin T. Major from the Lanier Law Firm's Issues and Appeals legal team.
Benjamin T. Major

Read Bio

Attorney
Benjamin T. Major is dedicated to issues and appeals, helping preserve multi-billion dollar judgments and secure favorable settlements. Notable achievements include preserving a tort judgment for ovarian cancer victims and defeating motions in antitrust and false claims litigation. Recognized as a Texas Rising Star (2018-2020), among others.

Headshot of Lanier Law Firm Senior attorney Case A. Dam, part of the Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure practice.
Case A. Dam

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Case A. Dam is dedicated to asbestos exposure, representing clients with mesothelioma, asbestosis, and related cancers. He has served veterans, automotive mechanics, and workers in various industries. Recognized in the 2024 Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers, among others.

Headshot of Darron E. Berquist, Managing Attorney Asbestos Litigation for the Lanier Law Firm.
Darron E. Berquist

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, Asbestos Litigation
Darron E. Berquist is dedicated to asbestos exposure and product liability. He was part of the team that secured a $4.69 billion jury verdict in Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson, linking asbestos in talcum powder to ovarian cancer. Recognized by Best Lawyers for Mass Tort and Product Liability Litigation (2024-2025).

Headshot of David L. Rosenband, Senior Attorney practicing Personal Injury and Pharmaceutical and Product Liability.
David L. Rosenband

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
David L. Rosenband is dedicated to pharmaceutical liability, personal injury, and product liability. He served as Liaison Counsel in the New York Bextra/Celebrex litigation and helped secure a $9 million verdict in the NJ Accutane case. Recognized for his work in MDLs and state court litigations.

Headshot of Evan M. Janush, Managing Attorney, New York, for Personal Injury, Pharmaceutical Liability, and Product Liability.
Evan M. Janush

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, New York
Evan M. Janush oversees the firm’s pharmaceutical and product liability mass tort litigation in New York. He served on the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee in MDL 2804 and was part of the trial team in the Vioxx cases. Recognized by Best Lawyers for Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions (2024-2025) and Lawdragon 500 (2020).

Judson A. Waltman

Read Bio

Judson A. Waltman is dedicated to personal injury, product liability, and maritime law. He secured one of the largest verdicts in Ward County, Texas, for an injured oilfield worker and a $2 million verdict for a Central Texas worker. Recognized by Best Lawyers for Personal Injury and Product Liability Litigation (2024-2025).

Headshot of Kevin LaMarca, Senior Attorney in the Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure, Personal Injury, and Product Liability practice.
Kevin LaMarca

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Kevin LaMarca is dedicated to asbestos exposure, personal injury, and product liability. He secured multiple seven-figure settlements, including $2.25 million for a deceased papermill worker’s family. Recognized as a National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40, Kevin represents clients across the country in both state and federal courts.

Headshot of Manny Cabrera, Lanier Law Firm Senior Attorney for the asbestos exposure and mesothelioma practice.
Manny Cabrera

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Manny Cabrera is dedicated to asbestos exposure and catastrophic injury cases. He has represented clients in asbestos-related matters and personal injury, as well as trucking and premises liability cases. Honored as a National Trial Lawyers Civil Plaintiff Top 40 Under 40.

Headshot of Maura Kolb, Managing Attorney, Asbestos Resolution in the mesothelioma and pharmaceutical liability practice.
Maura Kolb

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, Asbestos Resolution
Maura Kolb leads the Asbestos Resolution Team, securing millions for clients annually. She was part of the team that won a $258 million Vioxx verdict and has coordinated BP Gulf Oil Spill settlements. Recognized by Lawdragon 500 (2024), Maura serves on several national asbestos trust advisory committees.

Headshot of Megan Waida, Senior Attorney in the Lanier Law Firm's Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure practice.
Megan Waida

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Megan Waida is dedicated to asbestos exposure and appellate cases. Named to the National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 (2018-2021), Megan advocates for asbestos victims and has a strong background in complex litigation.

Headshot of Michael A. Akselrud, Senior Attorney in our Business Litigation, Personal Injury, and Product Liability practice.
Michael A. Akselrud

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Michael A. Akselrud is dedicated to personal injury, business litigation, and product liability. He was part of the trial team that secured a $4.69 billion verdict in the Johnson & Johnson talcum powder case. Recognized by Super Lawyers as a Rising Star (2016) and named to LawDragon 500 (2020).

Headshot of Michelle Greene, Senior Attorney in our Pharmaceutical Liability and Product Liability practice.
Michelle Greene

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Michelle Greene is dedicated to pharmaceutical and product liability, with a focus on toxic torts. She represented clients in AFFF and PFAS contamination cases. Recognized by Best Lawyers as “Ones to Watch” (2024-2025) and listed in Lawdragon’s Next Generation (2025) for Plaintiff Litigation.

Headshot of Patrice McKinney, Lanier Law Firm Senior Attorney in personal injury, product liability, and FELA.
Patrice McKinney

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Patrice McKinney is dedicated to personal injury, product liability, and FELA cases, with a focus on railroad workers injured on the job, car and trucking collisions, and oilfield injuries. Recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer (2017-2024) and Best Lawyers (2024-2025) for Personal Injury.

Headshot of Rachel Lanier, Managing Attorney, Los Angeles, Product Liability and Pharmaceutical Liability
Rachel Lanier

Read Bio

Managing Attorney, Los Angeles
Rachel Lanier is dedicated to pharmaceutical and product liability, helping secure the $4.6 billion verdict in Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson. Recognized by Best Lawyers (2024-2025) for Mass Tort and Personal Injury, Rachel leads the firm’s social media addiction lawsuits and represents clients in high-profile MDLs.

Headshot of Rebecca Phillips, The Lanier Law Firm's Mass Torts Director.
Rebecca Phillips

Read Bio

Mass Torts Director
Rebecca Phillips is dedicated to pharmaceutical liability, business litigation, and appeals. Co-lead counsel in the Bard Implant litigation, she also helped secure billions in opioid recovery for Texas. Recent honors include Super Lawyers Rising Star and Lawdragon 500 (2024-2025), among others.

Headshot of Sam E. Taylor, Senior Litigation Counsel for the Lanier Law Firm Personal Injury practice.
Sam E. Taylor

Read Bio

Senior Litigation Counsel
Sam E. Taylor is board-certified in Personal Injury Trial Law and Civil Trial Law, with over 30 years of experience. He has tried over 50 civil jury trials, including mesothelioma and wrongful death cases. Recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer since 2008, Sam holds an AV Preeminent Rating for 25+ years.

Headshot of Zeke DeRose, Lanier Law Firm Senior Attorney, Business Litigation
Zeke DeRose

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Zeke DeRose is dedicated to business litigation, antitrust, and product liability. He is part of the legal team in an antitrust case against Google and represents the State of Arkansas in litigation against Meta. Recognized by Lawdragon 500 (2025) and Best Lawyers (2025), Zeke is a member of the National Trial Lawyers Top 100.

Headshot of Lanier Law Firm Senior attorney Catherine Heacox, part of the Personal Injury, Pharmaceutical and Product Liability practice.
Catherine Heacox

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Catherine Heacox is dedicated to pharmaceutical liability, personal injury, and product liability. Recognized by Super Lawyers as New York Metro Super Lawyer since 2013, Catherine has extensive experience in MDL and mass tort litigation.

Headshot of attorney Richard D. Meadow who serves as Of Counsel for the Lanier Law Firm.
Richard Meadow

Read Bio

Of Counsel
Richard Meadow’s broad legal experience spans multiple practice areas and jurisdictions. He is recognized in Best Lawyers 2025 for his work in Mass Tort Litigation and Personal Injury Litigation. With over three decades of experience, Richard has dedicated his career to championing the rights of injured individuals.

Headshot of the Lanier Law Firm's attorney Kelsey Stokes
Kelsey Stokes

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Kelsey Stokes is dedicated to mass tort litigation, product liability, and complex litigation. With extensive experience in trial and settlement negotiations, she continues to be a leader in medical device litigation recognized by Super Lawyers Rising Stars (2022).

Headshot of Lanier Law Firm senior attorney Lee Cirsch
Lee Cirsch

Read Bio

Senior Attorney
Lee Cirsch is an experienced trial lawyer with over two decades of handling personal injury, product liability, and business litigation cases. His experience representing both plaintiffs and defendants gives him a unique ability to anticipate his opponent’s strategy, providing clients with an edge in litigation.